Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro has an overall score of 84.9, which is better than the Galaxy A20's 74.7 general score. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy A20 comes with Android 11 operating system. Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro is better than the Galaxy A20, we must tell that it is also a heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone.
The iPhone 11 Pro features a quite superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU and a higher amount of RAM memory. The iPhone 11 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a lot more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a better camera than Galaxy A20, because although it has a lesser MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality, a bigger aperture and a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. The Galaxy A20 counts with a much better memory for apps and games than iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A20 features superior battery duration than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3046mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A20. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Apple iPhone 11 Pro, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A20, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.