Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is just a bit better than Galaxy A20, having an 80.3 score against 74.7. Even though Google Nexus 6P is extremely older and a bit heavier than the Galaxy A20, it's body is still just a bit thinner. Google Nexus 6P has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A20. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 processing cores.
The Google Nexus 6P has a brighter display than Galaxy A20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a way higher number of pixels per inch of display. Google Nexus 6P features a slightly bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A20, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
Google Nexus 6P shoots slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy A20, because although it has a less megapixels back facing camera and a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher video quality. The Samsung Galaxy A20 counts with just a little better battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A20. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A20, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.