Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is slightly better than Galaxy A20, getting an 81.6 score against 74.7. The Google Pixel 2 body has the same thickness than Galaxy A20, but it's somewhat lighter. Google Pixel 2 counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 2 also has 1 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 2 has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater pixels number per display inch and a better resolution of 1080 x 1920px. Google Pixel 2 features just a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A20 has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh. Google Pixel 2 features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a larger sensor which gives a better image and video quality, a larger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations and a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, the Google Pixel 2 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.