Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL has a score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A20's overall score of 74.7. Despite of the fact Google Pixel XL is noticeably older and a bit thicker than the Galaxy A20, it's body is still a little bit lighter. The Google Pixel XL's processing unit is just as good as the Galaxy A20 one, because although the Google Pixel XL has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with 1 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel XL has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much better screen density and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Google Pixel XL counts with just a bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A20, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel XL features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A20, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and a worse 12.3 mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a way larger back camera sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality and a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A20 features just a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A20. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Galaxy A20, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.