Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 268 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A20, getting a 77 score against 74.7. HTC U Ultra's design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A20, but it's just a little heavier. HTC U Ultra has a brighter screen than Galaxy A20, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a way better pixel amount per display inch.
The HTC U Ultra features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A20, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. The HTC U Ultra's processor is very similar to Galaxy A20's processor, because although the HTC U Ultra has lesser cores , it also counts with more RAM.
HTC U Ultra takes a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A20, because although it has a lesser MP resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture, a much higher video resolution and a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much better quality photographs and videos.
The Galaxy A20 counts with better battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A20. So if you need that extra features, you can buy HTC U Ultra, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A20, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.