Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 has a score of 77, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A20's 74.7 general score. LG V20's design is just a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A20, although it's just a bit heavier and was released 3 years before. Samsung Galaxy A20 and LG V20 both have really similar CPUs, because although the LG V20 has lesser processing cores , it also counts with 1 GB more RAM.
LG V20 has a sharper screen than Galaxy A20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much better pixels quantity per inch in the display and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. LG V20 features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A20, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V20 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A20, because it has a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality, a more MP back camera, a larger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and videos and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution. Galaxy A20 features superior battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
LG V20 is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.