Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is better than Galaxy A20's score of 74.7. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Galaxy A20 has Android 11 version. Although it's the best in this review, it must be noted that it's also a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a way greater display pixels density. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal storage. The LG V50 ThinQ and Galaxy A20 feature quite similar batteries. LG V50 ThinQ has a better camera than Galaxy A20, because although it has a camera with a worse 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a way larger aperture for better low light photography and videos and a larger sensor taking better quality videos and pictures.
LG V50 ThinQ is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A20, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.