Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A20, having a score of 76.4 against 74.7. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Droid Turbo has newer 4.4.4 version while Samsung Galaxy A20 has Android 11, so it gives a couple additional features. Even being the best in this review, the Motorola Droid Turbo is an a lot older, just a little bit heavier and a lot thicker cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A20.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with an incredibly better screen than Galaxy A20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater count of pixels per screen inch and a much higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. Galaxy A20 has a much bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A20 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A20, because although it has lesser processing cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with an additional GPU. The Motorola Droid Turbo captures slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy A20, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a way higher resolution back camera.
Galaxy A20 features just a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3900mAh.
The Motorola Droid Turbo is a bit more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A20, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.