Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has an overall score of 77.9, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A20's 74.7 score. Even though Motorola DROID Turbo is a better cellphone than Galaxy A20, it must be told that it's also incredibly older, a lot thicker and a bit heavier. Both devices we are comparing here have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola DROID Turbo has the newer 4.4.4 version and Galaxy A20 has Android 11 version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Motorola DROID Turbo features an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a lot more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A20 counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A20, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video definition and a camera with way more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A20 counts with just a little better battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3900mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Motorola DROID Turbo is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.