Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 166.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus has a score of 79.7, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A20's 74.7 global score. Even though the Moto G Stylus is newer than the Galaxy A20, it is thicker and heavier. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS. The Moto G Stylus features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G Stylus also has 1 GB more RAM.
Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has more pixels per inch of display and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2300. The Moto G Stylus counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A20, because it has a camera in the back with way more mega pixels, a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and videos, a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a way larger camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and pictures.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus features much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A20, and although they both have a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A20 and the Motorola Moto G Stylus count with similar battery performance.
Although Motorola Moto G Stylus is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A20. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Galaxy A20, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.