Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z4 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A20, having a 79.8 score against 74.7. Motorola Moto Z4 is a just a little thinner and just a bit lighter device than Samsung Galaxy A20, although both were released with only 2 months difference. These devices have Android OS, but Motorola Moto Z4 has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A20 has Android 11.
Motorola Moto Z4 features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have a same size display, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has much more pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. Motorola Moto Z4 counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has more RAM.
Motorola Moto Z4 features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A20, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A20 has a bit longer battery duration than Moto Z4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
The Motorola Moto Z4 captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a larger aperture, a way higher video resolution, a lot higher resolution back camera and a much bigger back camera sensor.
Although Motorola Moto Z4 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A20. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z4, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy A20, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.