Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 has a score of 84.9, which is much better than the Galaxy A20's overall score of 74.7. Even though Galaxy A80 is better than the Galaxy A20, we must tell that it's also somewhat thicker and much heavier. The Galaxy A80 features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a quite larger display, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a greater pixels density.
Galaxy A80 features just a bit more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A20, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A80 has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A80 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A80 takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A20, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition, a way more MP camera and a way bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Galaxy A20 has a little better battery performance than Galaxy A80, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.