Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass |
| $ 166.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is much better than the Galaxy A20's global score of 74.7. The Galaxy A90 5G has Android operating system, while Galaxy A20 has Android 11 operating system. Even being the best in our current comparison, Galaxy A90 5G's design is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than Galaxy A20.
Galaxy A90 5G has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A20, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has 3 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A90 5G has a more vivid display than Galaxy A20, because it has a bit larger screen, a greater screen density and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light captures, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way higher 48 MP resolution camera.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A20, and although they both have a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A90 5G also has more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A20, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.