Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a general score of 79.3, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A20's 74.7 overall score. The Galaxy S6 edge+ is an extremely older phone than the Galaxy A20, but it is a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S6 edge+ has an older 5.1 version and Galaxy A20 has Android 11.
The Galaxy A20 features a bit better CPU than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ features a way better looking screen than Galaxy A20, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better quantity of pixels per display inch and a lot better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The Galaxy A20 counts with a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A20, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ also has a larger camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality, a way better 3840x2160 video resolution and a higher 16 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A20 features longer battery performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 33 percent larger battery size.
Although Galaxy S6 edge+ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A20. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Samsung Galaxy A20, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.