Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro is a little bit better than Galaxy A20, with a general score of 78.8 against 74.7. The vivo X60 Pro is a newer and a little bit thinner device than Galaxy A20, but it is just a little bit heavier. These phones include the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Vivo X60 Pro features a more vivid display than Galaxy A20, because it has a little bigger screen, a way better 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
Vivo X60 Pro features a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy A20, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a superior performance than Galaxy A20, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 9 GB more RAM memory.
The vivo X60 Pro has just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A20, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity. The vivo X60 Pro has a lot better camera than Galaxy A20, because it has a lot larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a larger camera aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited environments, a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera and a much better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.