Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is much better than the Galaxy A20's 74.7 score. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a thicker and a little bit heavier phone than Galaxy A20. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a sharper display than Galaxy A20, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a much higher 1080 x 2246px resolution.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a way bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A20, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a less megapixels resolution camera, and they both have a F1.9 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with a larger sensor and a much better (4K) video quality. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a battery performance that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A20 one.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A20. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy A20, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.