Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2017-09-22 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 296 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 has a global score of 85, which is much better than Galaxy A20e's score of 74.2. The Apple iPhone 8 is an older and just a little heavier cellphone than Galaxy A20e, but Apple was able to build it somewhat thinner anyway. The iPhone 8 has a better performing CPU than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone 8 features a better display than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little lower 750 x 1334 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit better number of pixels in each inch of screen. The iPhone 8 counts with much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A20e, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Apple iPhone 8 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. Galaxy A20e has a very superior battery life than iPhone 8, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 1821mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.