Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is better than the Samsung Galaxy A20e, getting a global score of 84.5 against 74.2. IPhone XS Max's construction is a little bit thinner but way heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A20e, and both of them were released with only 7 months difference. The iPhone XS Max features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A20e, because it has way more pixels per screen inch, a lot better resolution of 1242 x 2688 and a quite larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A20e features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone XS Max, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB. Apple iPhone XS Max has a quite better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a 64 bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has a camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture and a way better video definition. Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has a 3179mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.