Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2017-09-21 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 is just a bit better than Galaxy A20e, getting a 79.1 score against 74.2. LG V30 is an older and somewhat heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A20e, but LG was able to build it somewhat thinner anyway. The LG V30 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A20e, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V30 also has more RAM memory.
The LG V30 features a brighter screen than Galaxy A20e, because it has a quite larger display, a much higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a much greater count of pixels per inch of display. The LG V30 has a much better memory for apps and games than Galaxy A20e, because it has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal memory capacity.
The LG V30 captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A20e, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations, a back facing camera with a higher resolution and a lot better video quality. The LG V30 features a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.