Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is much better than Samsung Galaxy A20e, with an 83.7 score against 74.2. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie. The LG V50 ThinQ is a incredibly heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy A20e, but they are equally thin.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A20e, because it has a little bigger display, a way higher display pixels density and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3120px. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a better hardware performance than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video quality and a way bigger aperture for better low-light photography and videos. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy A20e, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A20e, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.