Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2018-08-24 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is better than the Samsung Galaxy A20e, getting an 87.1 score against 74.2. The Galaxy Note9 design is noticeably heavier and just a little thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A20e. Galaxy Note9 counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A20e, because it has way more pixels per inch of display, a little bit bigger display and a much better resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
Galaxy Note9 has a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy A20e, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note9 also has 3 GB more RAM. Galaxy Note9 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a lesser mega pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low-light situations.
Galaxy Note9 features a much better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A20e, and although they both have an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy Note9 also has more internal memory. The Galaxy Note9 has superior battery duration than Galaxy A20e, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.