Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2017-09-19 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Blue, Pink and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 296 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ1 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A20e, getting a general score of 78.3 against 74.2. Xperia XZ1's body is somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy A20e, but it is a little bit heavier and was released around a year before. Sony Xperia XZ1 counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and more pixels per inch in the screen.
Sony Xperia XZ1 counts with a little better performance than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Sony Xperia XZ1 also has more RAM. The Xperia XZ1 features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A20e, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
The Sony Xperia XZ1 has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing images and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A20e counts with a bit superior battery performance than Xperia XZ1, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.