Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-05 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max has a general score of 84.5, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A20s's 77 score. IPhone XS Max's body is a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A20s, although it's somewhat heavier and was released about 13 months before. The Apple iPhone XS Max features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Apple iPhone XS Max also has a lot higher display pixel density and a way higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels.
The iPhone XS Max counts with a better CPU than Galaxy A20s, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The iPhone XS Max takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser MP, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a lot higher (4K) video quality and a way bigger back camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy A20s features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A20s also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A20s features better battery duration than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 26 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.