Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-05 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 264 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A20s is slightly better than the LG V20, having a 77 score against 77. Samsung Galaxy A20s is a notably newer cellphone than LG V20, but it is just a little heavier and just a little thicker. LG V20 features a CPU that's very similar to Galaxy A20s's CPU, and although the LG V20 has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), they both have the same RAM memory amount.
The LG V20 counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher screen pixel density and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. LG V20 features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V20 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A20s counts with greater battery life than LG V20, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. The LG V20 captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have the same aperture, the LG V20 also has a way larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos, a much higher (4K) video definition and a more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.