Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-05 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30 has a global score of 79.1, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A20s's global score of 77. Despite of the fact that LG V30 is incredibly older than the Samsung Galaxy A20s, it's body is lighter and a little thinner. The LG V30 features a lot better screen than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better pixel density and a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
The LG V30 counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy A20s. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores. LG V30 has a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V30 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V30 shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A20s, because it has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality, a larger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light situations, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with a higher 16 mega-pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A20s features superior battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.