Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-05 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Galaxy A20s, getting a general score of 83.7 against 77. These phones work with Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version while Galaxy A20s has Android 11. The LG V50 ThinQ is a just a bit thicker device than Galaxy A20s, but both of them have equal weights.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better processor than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. LG V50 ThinQ has a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a much better screen pixels density.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The LG V50 ThinQ captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a lower resolution back camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a bigger camera aperture and a lot bigger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality pictures.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a battery life that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A20s one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.