Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-10-05 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a score of 77.9, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A20s's 77 global score. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Motorola DROID Turbo has a more recent 4.4.4 version while Galaxy A20s has Android 11. The Motorola DROID Turbo design is just a bit lighter than Galaxy A20s, although it is much thicker and was released 5 years before.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has 1 GB less RAM and 4 less cpu cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a way better 2560 x 1440px resolution and a way greater pixels number per inch of screen.
Galaxy A20s features much more storage for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A20s also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola DROID Turbo takes better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much higher 20.7 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a way higher video resolution.
Galaxy A20s counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.