Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-05 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 has a global score of 81.2, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A20s's 77 global score. The Motorola Edge 50 body has the same thickness than Galaxy A20s, but it's just a little lighter. Both phones we compare here include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 has 14 version while Galaxy A20s has Android 11 version, giving a couple additional features and improved performance.
The Galaxy A20s counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 features a much better looking display than Galaxy A20s, because it has a little larger display, a much higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 and a lot better pixels density.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 has superior battery performance than Galaxy A20s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Motorola Edge 50 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a much higher 3840x2160 video quality, a much more MP back camera and a lot larger back camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.