Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-05 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 264 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has an overall score of 79.7, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A20s's overall score of 77. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the Motorola Moto G Stylus is a thicker and a little bit heavier device than Galaxy A20s. These devices have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
The Moto G Stylus counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch in the screen and a much better 1080 x 2300 resolution. Moto G Stylus has a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Moto G Stylus also has 128 GB internal storage.
The Moto G Stylus has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A20s. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM. Moto G Stylus's battery duration is just as good as the battery lifetime in Samsung Galaxy A20s. Moto G Stylus counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because it has a larger aperture for better photography and video in low light situations, a lot larger camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality, a much higher video resolution and a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.