Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-05 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A20s, with a score of 77.8 against 77. Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is heavier than Samsung Galaxy A20s, it's thinner and noticeably newer. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A20s has Android 11 version, giving you some additional features and improved performance.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because it has a larger display, a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a lot higher screen pixel density. Galaxy A20s has a lot better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy A20s, because it has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality, a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a back-facing camera with much more MP and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and videos in low-light environments.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A20s, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.