Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-29 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 has a general score of 77, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A21's score of 76.1. Although the LG V20 is notably older than the Samsung Galaxy A21, it's design is just a little bit thinner and a little lighter. Galaxy A21 has a bit better processing unit than LG V20, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
LG V20 counts with a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A21, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch in the display and a lot higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. The LG V20 features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A21, because it has 64 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A21 counts with superior battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh. LG V20 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A21, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 16 mega-pixels resolution and the same camera aperture, the LG V20 also has a larger camera sensor which offers a better image and video quality and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, LG V20 is also a bargain compared to others, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.