Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-29 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 194.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus has a score of 79.7, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A21's 76.1 score. Even though Moto G Stylus and the Galaxy A21 were released with only 2 months difference, the Moto G Stylus design is thicker but also a little lighter. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Moto G Stylus has a more recent 11 version while Galaxy A21 has Android 10, so it provides you a couple nice extra features.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A21, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2300px resolution and more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy A21 features a little better processing power than Moto G Stylus, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A21, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has 96 GB more internal memory. Moto G Stylus shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy A21, because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a lot better resolution camera, a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Moto G Stylus has a battery duration that is very similar to the Galaxy A21 one.
Although Moto G Stylus is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A21, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A21. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Moto G Stylus, else you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy A21, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.