Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-29 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black | Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z4 is a little bit better than Galaxy A21, getting a general score of 79.8 against 76.1. Both of these phones include the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect. Despite of the fact that Moto Z4 is older than Galaxy A21, it's construction is lighter and a little bit thinner.
Moto Z4 has a slightly better screen than Galaxy A21, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels quantity in each inch in the screen and a much higher 1080 x 2340px resolution. The Moto Z4 has a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A21, and although they both have an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Moto Z4 also has 96 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A21 has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z4, although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Moto Z4 counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A21, because it has a much more MP camera, a much larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and videos, a way better (4K) video quality and a larger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy A21 counts with a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Motorola Moto Z4 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A21, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A21. If you want to save some money, you can get the Galaxy A21, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.