Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-29 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 194.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A21's global score of 76.1. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro construction is way newer and way thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Galaxy A21. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has newer 14 version and Galaxy A21 has Android 10, giving you a lot of extra features.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A21, because it has a way better pixels density, a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a bigger display. Samsung Galaxy A21 counts with a much better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 13 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A21, because it has a camera with a lot better 50 megapixels resolution, a bigger aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited situations, a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior storage for apps and games than Galaxy A21, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A21, because it has a 43 percent more battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A21, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A21. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Galaxy A21, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.