Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A21s, getting a global score of 79.1 against 77.7. Even though LG V30 is a lot older than the Samsung Galaxy A21s, it's design is thinner and lighter. LG V30 has an incredibly better display than Galaxy A21s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher display density and a much better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution.
LG V30 features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A21s, because it has 32 GB more internal memory and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V30 counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A21s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A21s shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A21s also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera and a much larger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy A21s features a much better battery duration than LG V30, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.