Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-19 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A21s's 77.7 score. Even though the LG V50 ThinQ is older than the Galaxy A21s, it's design is just a bit lighter and a little thinner. These phones use the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit superior processor than Galaxy A21s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM. LG V50 ThinQ features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A21s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a lot higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A21s shoots a bit better videos and photos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a lot tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light images and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A21s also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A21s, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A21s counts with greater battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 25 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.