Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-19 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ3 has a global score of 79.6, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A21s's 77.7 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xperia XZ3 has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy A21s has Android 10 version, so it provides lots of additional features. Although the Xperia XZ3 is better than Samsung Galaxy A21s, it must be told that it is also older, just a little heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Xperia XZ3 has a much better looking display than Galaxy A21s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a much greater display pixels density. Xperia XZ3 has a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A21s, and although they both have an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Xperia XZ3 also has 32 GB more internal storage.
Xperia XZ3 has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A21s, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xperia XZ3 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy A21s counts with a way better battery life than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A21s has a slightly better camera than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have a F2 aperture, the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A21s also has a larger back camera sensor and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.