Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.78 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy A21s, with a 78.8 score against 77.7. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but vivo X60 Pro has newer 11 version and Galaxy A21s has Android 10 version. Vivo X60 Pro is a newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat thinner and a little lighter than Galaxy A21s.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A21s, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The vivo X60 Pro has a better display than Galaxy A21s, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2376px, a little larger screen and more pixels per inch in the screen.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A21s, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A21s counts with better battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Vivo X60 Pro takes slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy A21s, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.