Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 has a general score of 85, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A22 5G's global score of 84.6. The iPhone 8 is an incredibly older cellphone than the Galaxy A22 5G, but Apple managed to make it a lot lighter and somewhat thinner. Apple iPhone 8 counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Apple iPhone 8 counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, although it has a lot worse resolution of 750 x 1334px, a quite worse pixel density and a really smaller screen. Galaxy A22 5G counts with a little bit better camera than iPhone 8, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a camera with a much better resolution.
The Apple iPhone 8 has a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.