Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a little bit better than Apple iPhone XS Max, with a global score of 84.6 against 84.5. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's design is noticeably newer and just a little bit lighter than the Apple iPhone XS Max's, but it's thicker. The iPhone XS Max counts with a better processing power than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone XS Max features a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixel density and a quite better 1242 x 2688 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G captures slightly better videos and photos than iPhone XS Max, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy A22 5G counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A22 5G has a very superior battery life than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 57% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.