Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 5G has an overall score of 84.6, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 2's 81.6 score. Although the Galaxy A22 5G is noticeably newer than the Google Pixel 2, it is notably heavier and thicker. Google Pixel 2 has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy A22 5G shoots clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the same video frame rates and a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
Galaxy A22 5G features a very superior memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A22 5G has a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.