Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 5G is slightly better than LG V20, having a general score of 84.6 against 77. Galaxy A22 5G's body is noticeably newer, but thicker and heavier than the LG V20. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a little better processing power than LG V20, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a higher number of cores.
The LG V20 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater display density. The LG V20 has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V20 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G shoots a little bit better photos and videos than LG V20, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a very superior battery life than LG V20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.