Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-24 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G has a global score of 84.6, which is a bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 overall score. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A22 5G has the newer 11 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10, giving you a lot of extra features and improved performance. The Galaxy A22 5G body is a lot newer than the LG V50 ThinQ's, although it is a bit heavier and a little bit thicker.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A22 5G counts with a little bit better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and video in poorly lited environments and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A22 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A22 5G counts with improved battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.