Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Stylus, getting an 84.6 score against 79.7. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's design is newer and just a little thinner, but also a bit heavier than the Motorola Moto G Stylus. Both phones we are comparing use the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should give the same operating system features.
Galaxy A22 5G has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a quite bigger display and a little bit greater display density. The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a slightly better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. Moto G Stylus shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a 48 MP camera in the back, the Moto G Stylus also has a bigger aperture to capture better photography in low-light environments and a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features greater battery life than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.