Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has an overall score of 84.9, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A22 5G's 84.6 global score. Even being the best we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy A80 is a much older, just a little thicker and a bit heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A22 5G. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a little greater pixel quantity in each inch of display.
Galaxy A80 has a bit better processor than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A80 also has more RAM. The Galaxy A22 5G features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A80, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A80 features a bit better camera than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light images and video, and they both have a 48 MP resolution camera in the back, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a way better (4K) video definition. Galaxy A22 5G counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.