Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-06-24 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having an 84.6 score against 77.8. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a much older and notably thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung was able to make it a bit lighter anyway.
The Galaxy A22 5G has a much powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much sharper display than Galaxy A22 5G, because it has a little bit higher pixels density, a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a bigger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because it has a camera in the back with more mega pixels, a way higher video definition and a larger camera aperture to take better low light images and video. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a little better battery life than Galaxy A22 5G, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.