Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, having an 85.5 score against 84.6. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 construction has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, but it's somewhat lighter. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2246, it also counts with a just a little better pixel amount per inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 256 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G takes a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with longer battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.