Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-02 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is a little bit better than Galaxy A22, with a general score of 81.6 against 76.1. The Google Pixel 2 body is just a little thinner and incredibly lighter than Galaxy A22, even though it was released many years before. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A22. Both have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM amount.
The Google Pixel 2 features a brighter screen than Galaxy A22, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a lot better pixel density. Google Pixel 2 captures a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a much lower 12.2 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Google Pixel 2 also counts with a way higher (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 features a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB. Google Pixel 2 has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.