Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-02 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 274 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 is a bit better than the Galaxy A22, getting a 77 score against 76.1. LG V20 is an extremely older phone than Galaxy A22, but it's a bit thinner and just a little lighter anyway. The Samsung Galaxy A22 has a little better processing power than LG V20, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A22 also has a larger number of cores (although they are slower).
LG V20 has a more vivid display than Galaxy A22, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way greater screen pixels density and a way better 1440 x 2560px resolution. The LG V20 features a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A22, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V20 also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V20 counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy A22. The LG V20 counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a camera with a way worse resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the LG V20 also counts with a lot better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.