Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-07-02 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is much better than Galaxy A22, with an 83.7 score against 76.1. LG V50 ThinQ's design has the same thickness than Galaxy A22, but it's a little lighter. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while Galaxy A22 has Android 12 version.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A22, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have a same size screen, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a much better 1440 x 3120px resolution and way more pixels per display inch.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A22, because although it has a back facing camera with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition and a larger diafragm aperture. LG V50 ThinQ features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory.
LG V50 ThinQ has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.